Showing posts with label Hank Paulson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hank Paulson. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Thread dedicated to the AIG - Geithner - Paulson hearings to begin at 10:00 am

Link to live hearing - here
Real player link - here

Agenda - from the committee website


"The Federal Bailout of AIG"
PDF
Print
On Wednesday, January 27, 2010,  the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will hold a hearing titled: "The Federal Bailout of AIG" to examine the Federal response to the collapse of AIG. The hearing will focus on the decision to compensate AIG's credit default swap counterparties at 100 cents on the dollar following AIG's near-bankruptcy and the Federal Reserve's alleged attempt to keep secret the names of the counterparties and the amounts they were paid.

The hearing will take place at 10:00 a.m. in room 2154 Rayburn House Office Building.


Connect to the Live Webcast The witnesses scheduled to testify are:
Panel I
The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner
Secretary
United States Treasury Department
Mr. Henry "Hank" Paulson
Former Secretary
United States Department of Treasury
Panel II
Mr. Neil Barofsky
Special Inspector General
Troubled Asset Relief Program
Mr. Thomas C. Baxter
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Mr. Elias Habayeb
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer - Financial Services Division
American International Group, Inc.
Mr. Stephan Friedman
Former Chairman
Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Documents and Links


Opening Statement of Chairman Edolphus Towns
Prepared testimony of Secretary Timothy Geithner
Prepared testimony of Mr. Henry Paulson
Prepared testimony of Mr. Neil Barofsky
Prepared testimony of Mr. Thomas Baxter
Prepared testimony of Mr. Elias Habayeb
Prepared testimony of Mr. Stephen Friedmam



Update: Unredacted AIG Schedule A Released And Initial Data Spread - from Zero Hedge - posted 6:00

AIG’s mysterious Schedule A finally revealed - Reuters - added 8:55

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Neel Kashkari and his new job at Pimco - for reference - from the NYT - published December 31, 2009

Full article here
NOTE:Not sure about the date, one place says December 31, 2009, and below says January 1, 2010

January 1, 2010
Neel Kashkari’s Quiet Path to Pimco
By DEVIN LEONARD

The financial crisis did not produce many stars. One of the few was Neel T. Kashkari, the former Bush administration bailout chief.

A onetime investment banker at Goldman Sachs, Mr. Kashkari became an instant celebrity in October 2008 when he was tapped by Henry M. Paulson Jr., then the Treasury secretary, to run the Troubled Asset Relief Program for banks. He was christened “the $700 billion man” for overseeing such a huge amount of banking aid.

Power attracts attention. People magazine called Mr. Kashkari, a 35-year-old with a hawk nose and a shaved head, one of the sexiest men alive. When he resigned his post as assistant Treasury secretary on May 1, a few months after the transition to the Obama administration, he seemed to be a highly marketable commodity.

Shortly after leaving government, he was a guest on the Charlie Rose television program on PBS.

“What’s the chance,” Mr. Rose asked pointedly, “you are going to go back into the financial sector and make a ton of money?”

“I’m going to take several months off,” Mr. Kashkari replied. “I do plan to go back into the private sector, likely in finance in some capacity, but I have no idea what that’s going to be.”

For a time, Mr. Kashkari did indeed decompress, in a cabin in California, not far from Lake Tahoe.

Then on Dec. 14, he went to work as head of new investment initiatives at the Pacific Investment Management Company, or Pimco, the powerful bond investment company based in Newport Beach, Calif., whose top executives have boasted of their access to government officials. Alan Greenspan, a former chairman of the Federal Reserve, is among its consultants.

In hindsight, it’s easy to understand Mr. Kashkari’s reluctance to discuss his job hunt. He was in a bit of a bind after leaving government. Landing a job at a bank that had taken bailout money would have drawn criticism.

But even though Pimco was not a recipient of government aid, Mr. Kashkari’s career move raised eyebrows. Bloggers joked about how — in their view — he had all along been doing the company’s work in Washington.

During the crisis, William H. Gross, the founder and co-chief investment officer of Pimco, who is known for his witty letters to investors and his appearances on CNBC, frequently offered advice to the Treasury about how to handle the bailout.

At the same time, Pimco’s publicly stated strategy was to invest money in areas that would benefit from the government’s rescue efforts. The company called this its “shake hands with the government” plan.

The strategy paid off. The company’s flagship Total Return Fund turned in a strong performance in 2008. The fund’s Class A shares, available to individual investors, were up 4.3 percent — nine percentage points ahead of comparable bond funds, according to Morningstar. And by late September 2009, Pimco’s assets under management had swelled 32 percent, to $940 billion, from the end of 2008.

Outsiders consider Mr. Kashkari’s addition a natural strengthening of Pimco’s ties to government.

“Kashkari brings a great deal of potential benefit to Pimco in terms of government knowledge and connections to both parties,” said Douglas J. Elliott, a Brookings Institution fellow and former managing director at J.P. Morgan. “He understands what the government is likely to do and has a good understanding of the financial sector. So I can really see why Pimco would want him.”

Scott Talbott, senior vice president for government affairs with the Financial Services Roundtable, an industry lobbying group, agreed that Pimco could benefit from Mr. Kashkari’s recent foray in Washington. “Why pay the extra dollars that his political experience can command if they aren’t going to use it?” he asked.

Neither Pimco nor Mr. Kashkari would discuss how he ended up at the company or how he would be compensated. But people familiar with his job search said he wanted to work for a company where he could start a new business — just as he had with the relief fund for the federal government.

Pimco said in a statement that Mr. Kashkari’s first task would be to recruit new employees and help build a new division that would invest in stocks. Two people with direct knowledge of his employment search said that he would not be taking part in the company’s investing decisions. In fact, Pimco has hired two former equities portfolio managers from Franklin Templeton Investments to establish the new division’s moneymaking approach.

Mr. Kashkari left Goldman Sachs to become a senior adviser to Mr. Paulson in June 2006. Early on, he worked on housing issues. The people with knowledge of his employment search said that Mr. Kashkari met Mr. Gross while touring the country with the Treasury secretary in December 2007 to assess the country’s troubled housing market.

Several former Treasury officials said Mr. Gross had frequently been in touch with Mr. Kashkari and others in government about various initiatives. None of those officials or others suggested there was anything improper about those contacts.

“Gross was one of those guys, along with Warren Buffett, who were really interested in trying to give us ideas and be helpful in resolving the crisis,” said Robert F. Hoyt, a former Treasury Department general counsel under Mr. Paulson. “They would send memos to Treasury. They weren’t ideas we ended up implementing, but they were interesting.”

It was also hard, however, not to notice that Pimco was a direct beneficiary of the Treasury Department’s actions. In 2008, when it appeared that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac might fail, Mr. Gross saw an opportunity.

He moved Pimco’s flagship Total Return Fund heavily into mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the two agencies. Then he vociferously advocated for the government to rescue them during television appearances on CNBC and elsewhere. On Sept. 7, 2008, the fund’s value soared by $1.7 billion when Mr. Paulson announced the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As part of his government duties, Mr. Kashkari worked on that rescue effort.

Mr. Gross was also a strong supporter of the troubled asset program, originally envisioned as a way to purchase impaired assets from the nation’s ailing banks. He praised the plan on television and in a newspaper op-ed article, and he even offered to manage the government program at no charge.

Mr. Kashkari backed the asset purchase plan. Ultimately, though, Mr. Paulson decided to invest the government funds directly in the banks, considering it important to stave off disaster. Mr. Kashkari hired more than 135 lawyers, compliance officers and former bankers to execute the plan, and then had to defend the program on Capitol Hill, where he was sometimes treated like a piƱata.

In his appearance on Charlie Rose, Mr. Kashkari said that during Congressional hearings he kept an index card in front of him bearing the inscription: “The louder he yells, the calmer I shall be” — referring to any lawmaker who might be questioning him.

Mr. Kashkari’s successor at the Treasury is Herbert M. Allison Jr., 66, a senior banker with experience at Merrill Lynch and TIAA-CREF before he stepped into the breach at Fannie Mae when the government took control. Partly because the relief fund had largely been distributed before he arrived, Mr. Allison has had a much lower profile than his predecessor.

Monday, August 3, 2009

SEC charges BofA over false statements in Merrill buy - 1:00 PM

UPDATE - 1:52 - More from MarketWatch BofA pays $33 million SEC penalty for Merrill deal's bonuses The charges are in relation to the institution's controversial acquisition of Merrill WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Bank of America Corp. agreed to a $33 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which said the mega-bank made "materially false and misleading statements" to shareholders about billions in bonuses paid to Merrill Lynch executives before completing its controversial acquisition of the brokerage firm. "The SEC alleges that in proxy materials soliciting the votes of shareholders on the proposed acquisition of Merrill, Bank of America stated that Merrill had agreed that it would not pay year-end performance bonuses or other discretionary compensation to its executives prior to the closing of the merger without Bank of America's consent," the SEC wrote. "In fact, Bank of America had already contractually authorized Merrill to pay up to $5.8 billion in discretionary bonuses to Merrill executives for 2008." According to the SEC's complaint, Bank of America /quotes/comstock/13*!bac/quotes/nls/bac (BAC 15.31, +0.52, +3.52%) said in a November, 2008, joint proxy statement for the acquisition that Merrill said it would not pay year-end bonuses to top executives before closing without Bank of America's consent. "The disclosures in the proxy statement were rendered materially false and misleading by the existence of the prior undisclosed agreement allowing Merrill to pay billions of dollars in bonuses for 2008," the SEC said. The SEC charges come after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Bank of America Chief Executive Ken Lewis and former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson have received a barrage of criticism from lawmakers over the past couple months. Paulson and Bernanke have recently responded to a wide-variety of concerns expressed by lawmakers, ranging from criticism that they ordered Bank of America Chief Executive Ken Lewis to go through with the Merrill Lynch acquisition against his will, to questions why they didn't oust the bank's management and board upon providing government assistance.
SEC charges BofA over false statements in Merrill buy - Reuters (Reuters) - Bank of America Corp was charged by the SEC on Monday with making "materially false and misleading statements" in the Merrill Lynch acquisition, court documents said. * SEC says Bank of America said Merrill "had agreed not to pay year-end performance bonuses" before the closing of the merger but that no such agreement had been reached- court documents * SEC says Bank of America had agreed to pay up to $5.8 billion in Merrill bonuses, contrary to statements in merger agreement- court documents * SEC says bank of America falsely claimed that Merrill had agreed not to pay performance bonuses before closing of merger- court documents * SEC seeks injunction barring Bank of America executives from breaking securities laws and seeks fine
What about Bernanke and Paulson?

Friday, July 17, 2009

Hank Paulson vs. Marcy Kaptur at testimony - 3:30PM

I saw this live and thought it was pretty good. This was from Thursday, July 16, 2009 Good for Marcy, like her or not.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Don't forget, Paulson to testify tomorrow about BAC - 2:45

Full article here - WSJ WASHINGTON -- Former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson plans to tell lawmakers he acted appropriately in warning Bank of America Corp. Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis that the firm's management could be ousted if it walked away from its deal to buy Merrill Lynch, saying such a move would have suggested a "colossal lack of judgment." [Henry Paulson] Mr. Paulson, in remarks prepared for an appearance before a House panel on Thursday, said that Bank of America had no legal basis to nix the Merrill deal in the wake of rising losses at the investment bank last December. Any attempt to cancel the merger would have threatened the viability of both Bank of America and Merrill, as well as the broader financial system, Mr. Paulson said. Link to the released statement by Paulson - WSJ