Thursday, December 5, 2013
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Monday, December 2, 2013
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Monday, November 25, 2013
Saturday, November 23, 2013
Historical CPI numbers and CAGR projected into future
Ok so I'm not done.
This is all quite fascinating. Fascinating watching tribal politics trump common sense, and even more fascinating how it trumps simple arithmetic. When we get things such as "semantic tells" or "Manichean view" thrown in the mix we have really fell off the reservation.
Debt is good, and simply a "policy tool." Nothing to see here, move along. LOL!
Well, it so happens, we available to us, data to support what that policy tool has done and can do. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has a plethora of historical data available in what they call the CPI, or the Consumer Price Index, to show us what the costs of goods and services have cost us over a period of years, sortable, and categorized to provide the data. Let's take a look shall we?
I went back to 1980 for the data and compared those numbers to today (2013), then projected those number into the future using the inflation target number given by the Federal Reserve, which is 2%. The exceptions are a couple that only went back to 1995, and the one I used 1913 for obvious reasons.
I then projected to the future 25, 50, and 75 years. I chose that number as 75 years is a nice average lifetime of a human.
Projecting from 1980 (or 1995) to 2013 you can figure the CAGR (Compounded Annual Growth Rate) using a simple formula in Excel (the BLS site allows you to search and download the table data).
Using the current 2013 price data, and the Federal Reserve's 2 percent inflation target, we can project those values out the 25, 50, and 75 years to get an idea what things might cost in 2088.
From this data we can also see, the CAGR of these prices grew faster than the projected 2 percent the Fed is targeting (all but a couple of the example I used), which makes the 2 percent Fed number low, which many economists also believe. And why shouldn't they, the numbers are what they are.
I chose random items we all have, use, or buy, and a couple others just for fun.
All data can be found at the BLS at; BLS CPI data or FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data); FRED data
And for fun, let's take a look at those number if the Fed target inflation number is higher than their 2%.
At 3 percent:
At 4;
So debt and the resulting inflation is good. Just a tool, nothing to see here. Got it. Keep printing more money because more money will create more growth, or more prosperity, or more something. That's some wild stuff right there.
Go sell your BS to someone else cause I'm not buying, I can't afford to, I can't keep up now.
As an aside, I didn't do this little experiment because of the debate in this thread. I did this a month or so ago when some of the newer data came out. I find this much more enlightening than listening to some MMT ((M)agic (M)oney (T)ree) screwball tell me how printing money will fix the world and the Fed insanity is a giant conspiracy theory.
No wonder this country is truly ******.
This is all quite fascinating. Fascinating watching tribal politics trump common sense, and even more fascinating how it trumps simple arithmetic. When we get things such as "semantic tells" or "Manichean view" thrown in the mix we have really fell off the reservation.
Debt is good, and simply a "policy tool." Nothing to see here, move along. LOL!
Well, it so happens, we available to us, data to support what that policy tool has done and can do. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has a plethora of historical data available in what they call the CPI, or the Consumer Price Index, to show us what the costs of goods and services have cost us over a period of years, sortable, and categorized to provide the data. Let's take a look shall we?
I went back to 1980 for the data and compared those numbers to today (2013), then projected those number into the future using the inflation target number given by the Federal Reserve, which is 2%. The exceptions are a couple that only went back to 1995, and the one I used 1913 for obvious reasons.
I then projected to the future 25, 50, and 75 years. I chose that number as 75 years is a nice average lifetime of a human.
Projecting from 1980 (or 1995) to 2013 you can figure the CAGR (Compounded Annual Growth Rate) using a simple formula in Excel (the BLS site allows you to search and download the table data).
Using the current 2013 price data, and the Federal Reserve's 2 percent inflation target, we can project those values out the 25, 50, and 75 years to get an idea what things might cost in 2088.
From this data we can also see, the CAGR of these prices grew faster than the projected 2 percent the Fed is targeting (all but a couple of the example I used), which makes the 2 percent Fed number low, which many economists also believe. And why shouldn't they, the numbers are what they are.
I chose random items we all have, use, or buy, and a couple others just for fun.
And for fun, let's take a look at those number if the Fed target inflation number is higher than their 2%.
At 3 percent:
So debt and the resulting inflation is good. Just a tool, nothing to see here. Got it. Keep printing more money because more money will create more growth, or more prosperity, or more something. That's some wild stuff right there.
Go sell your BS to someone else cause I'm not buying, I can't afford to, I can't keep up now.
As an aside, I didn't do this little experiment because of the debate in this thread. I did this a month or so ago when some of the newer data came out. I find this much more enlightening than listening to some MMT ((M)agic (M)oney (T)ree) screwball tell me how printing money will fix the world and the Fed insanity is a giant conspiracy theory.
No wonder this country is truly ******.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Monday, November 18, 2013
Bakken, Crude Oil, PeakOilBarrel.com, EIA report, SAGD
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-11-17/guest-post-coming-bust-great-bakken-oil-field
http://peakoilbarrel.com/
http://www.eia.gov/
More EIA info
http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam-assisted_gravity_drainage
http://peakoilbarrel.com/
http://www.eia.gov/
More EIA info
http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam-assisted_gravity_drainage
Friday, November 15, 2013
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Monday, November 11, 2013
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Wall Street Code Released - Video
http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2013-11-04/wall-street-code-released
Monday, November 4, 2013
Link - Why Poverty - Cartoon on political parties - SSA - wage stats for 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6niWzomA_So&feature=c4-overview-vl&list=PLWB0UfoChWY2gN1daubiv6A5HNQqicAxM
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/netcomp.cgi?year=2012
Thursday, October 31, 2013
GM Bailout money, SIGTARP Report (518 pages)
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/10/29/us-treasury-reports-9-7b-loss-gm-shares/
http://www.sigtarp.gov/Quarterly%20Reports/October_29_2013_Report_to_Congress.pdf
http://www.sigtarp.gov/Quarterly%20Reports/October_29_2013_Report_to_Congress.pdf
Mike Rogers, bathroom cam
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131030/11223225071/rep-mike-rogers-angrily-defends-bathroom-spycam.shtml
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Friday, October 25, 2013
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Monday, October 21, 2013
Friday, October 18, 2013
The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind - Hidden Secrets of Money Episode 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
The rule - from a guy at NC
I liked this post, so I copied the "rule"
Here’s the rule: If there is a pot of money that can be raided, it will be raided. No matter what the “rules” are. No matter what rational people expect. No matter who gets hurt
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#comment-1501314
Here’s
the rule: If there is a pot of money that can be raided, it will be
raided. No matter what the “rules” are. No matter what rational people
expect. No matter who gets hurt.
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#ER5QSdslCUcjEA3D.99
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#ER5QSdslCUcjEA3D.99
Here’s the rule: If there is a pot of money that can be raided, it will be raided. No matter what the “rules” are. No matter what rational people expect. No matter who gets hurt
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#comment-1501314
Here’s
the rule: If there is a pot of money that can be raided, it will be
raided. No matter what the “rules” are. No matter what rational people
expect. No matter who gets hurt.
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#ER5QSdslCUcjEA3D.99
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#ER5QSdslCUcjEA3D.99
Here’s
the rule: If there is a pot of money that can be raided, it will be
raided. No matter what the “rules” are. No matter what rational people
expect. No matter who gets hurt.
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#ER5QSdslCUcjEA3D.99
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#ER5QSdslCUcjEA3D.99
Here’s
the rule: If there is a pot of money that can be raided, it will be
raided. No matter what the “rules” are. No matter what rational people
expect. No matter who gets hurt.
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#OUrJiYpv4LpKIM11.99
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#OUrJiYpv4LpKIM11.99
Here’s
the rule: If there is a pot of money that can be raided, it will be
raided. No matter what the “rules” are. No matter what rational people
expect. No matter who gets hurt.
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#OUrJiYpv4LpKIM11.99
Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/10/a-debt-deal-is-nigh-a-debt-deal-is-nigh-or-is-it.html#OUrJiYpv4LpKIM11.99
Monday, October 14, 2013
The Global Wealth Distribution, China - dollar reserve currency, David Stockman
http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-global-wealth-distribution.html
Global Wealth 2013 - Credit Suisse
Commentary: U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world - China paper on replacing the US dollar as reserve currency.
A piece about the piece above and reserve currency.
The birth of the 'de-Americanized' world
CPI from 1913 to Today from the BLS - reference
CPI - 1913 to now - from the BLS
David Stockman: Soak the Rich
Global Wealth 2013 - Credit Suisse
Commentary: U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world - China paper on replacing the US dollar as reserve currency.
A piece about the piece above and reserve currency.
The birth of the 'de-Americanized' world
CPI from 1913 to Today from the BLS - reference
CPI - 1913 to now - from the BLS
David Stockman: Soak the Rich
Friday, October 11, 2013
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Friday, September 27, 2013
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Friday, September 20, 2013
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Movie, Money for Nothing
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/filmmaker-bet-on-financial-crisis-used-profit-to-make-documentary-about-federal-reserve/2013/09/13/6499e55e-14b0-11e3-880b-7503237cc69d_allComments.html?ctab=all_&
http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2013/09/13/review-money-for-nothing-sets-crisis-film-high/
http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2013/09/13/review-money-for-nothing-sets-crisis-film-high/
NSA
By “Secret Law” Did They Mean “Not Written Down”? Marcy Wheeler
New browser extensions let you hit the NSA where it hurts: in the data Quartz
The Many Flaws of Dual_EC_DRBG A Few Thoughts on Cry
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Monday, September 16, 2013
NSA
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-15/swift-takeover-follow-money-nsa-knows-all-about-your-spending-habits
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-15/nsas-transparency-thwarted-fax-machine
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-15/man-charge-nsa-modeled-his-office-bridge-starship-enterprise
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/15/nsa-mind-keith-alexander-star-trek
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-15/nsas-transparency-thwarted-fax-machine
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-15/man-charge-nsa-modeled-his-office-bridge-starship-enterprise
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/15/nsa-mind-keith-alexander-star-trek
Saturday, September 14, 2013
Friday, September 13, 2013
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Crisis cost up to $14 trillion, Dallas Fed says
Crisis cost up to $14 trillion, Dallas Fed says
(Special Report: Bank from the brink: 5 years later)
All totaled, the damage comes to $6 trillion to $14 trillion, a staggering number that nearly equates to an entire year of gross domestic product.
Broken down, that translates to $50,000 to $120,000 for every U.S. household "or the equivalent of 40 to 90 percent of one year's economic output," the paper said.
And it could be worse—a lot worse—depending on how long it takes for a full recovery to set in.
"If the effects of the crisis are permanent, the path of consumption observed since 2007 suggests that the cost of the crisis may be more than double the $6 trillion to $14 trillion estimate," the paper said.
(Read more: A financial crisis timeline)
The Dallas Fed used output-per-person totals as of mid-2013 to calculate the costs. It figured that number stood at 12 percent lower than typical recoveries over the past 50 years.
Some of the numbers the central bank branch cites are startling: a loss of 8.7 million nonfarm payroll jobs; a peak of 14.7 million unemployed, labor underutilization that remains "intractably high" and 10.6 million underemployed.
(Read more: Jobs growth misses high hopes; rate drops to 7.3%)
"A stark legacy of the recession and the lackluster labor market is reduced opportunity and deterioration captured in subjective measures of well-being," the paper said. "Since the recession's onset in December 2007, more citizens believed their income would be lower in the future than thought it would be higher. This is the first time in any recession since the 1960s that income expectations turned negative."
The U.S. fell from second to 18th on the Frasier Institute's Index of Economic Freedom ranking in 2012, a remnant, the Fed said, of the bailouts used to prop up Wall Street institutions at the center of the financial crisis.
The paper said:
The paper concluded:
The financial
crisis cost the U.S. economy $6 trillion to $14 trillion—and possibly
twice that—along with untold costs from "special treatment" that
too-big-to-fail banks received, according to an explosive new analysis
from the Dallas Federal Reserve.
Nearing the five-year anniversary of the Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy that shocked the global economy, the central bank analysis takes a stark look at the costs left behind by the crisis and the ensuing bailout.
Among the lasting damages, the paper cites continuing and pervasive unemployment as well as the opportunity costs that came from $12.6 trillion in direct aid given to the financial sector.
"The 2007–09 meltdown produced a huge downshift in the path of economic output, consumption and financial wealth," the paper said. "The nation has borne additional costs arising from psychological consequences, skill atrophy from extended unemployment, a reduced set of economic opportunities and increased government intervention in the economy."
Nearing the five-year anniversary of the Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy that shocked the global economy, the central bank analysis takes a stark look at the costs left behind by the crisis and the ensuing bailout.
Among the lasting damages, the paper cites continuing and pervasive unemployment as well as the opportunity costs that came from $12.6 trillion in direct aid given to the financial sector.
"The 2007–09 meltdown produced a huge downshift in the path of economic output, consumption and financial wealth," the paper said. "The nation has borne additional costs arising from psychological consequences, skill atrophy from extended unemployment, a reduced set of economic opportunities and increased government intervention in the economy."
Lessons from the financial crisis of 2008
Jessica Bibliowicz, former
Chairman & CEO of National Financial Partners, shares her
reflections on the huge blow to the U.S. banking system five years ago
and how she led her business back from the brink.
All totaled, the damage comes to $6 trillion to $14 trillion, a staggering number that nearly equates to an entire year of gross domestic product.
Broken down, that translates to $50,000 to $120,000 for every U.S. household "or the equivalent of 40 to 90 percent of one year's economic output," the paper said.
And it could be worse—a lot worse—depending on how long it takes for a full recovery to set in.
"If the effects of the crisis are permanent, the path of consumption observed since 2007 suggests that the cost of the crisis may be more than double the $6 trillion to $14 trillion estimate," the paper said.
(Read more: A financial crisis timeline)
The Dallas Fed used output-per-person totals as of mid-2013 to calculate the costs. It figured that number stood at 12 percent lower than typical recoveries over the past 50 years.
Some of the numbers the central bank branch cites are startling: a loss of 8.7 million nonfarm payroll jobs; a peak of 14.7 million unemployed, labor underutilization that remains "intractably high" and 10.6 million underemployed.
(Read more: Jobs growth misses high hopes; rate drops to 7.3%)
"A stark legacy of the recession and the lackluster labor market is reduced opportunity and deterioration captured in subjective measures of well-being," the paper said. "Since the recession's onset in December 2007, more citizens believed their income would be lower in the future than thought it would be higher. This is the first time in any recession since the 1960s that income expectations turned negative."
The U.S. fell from second to 18th on the Frasier Institute's Index of Economic Freedom ranking in 2012, a remnant, the Fed said, of the bailouts used to prop up Wall Street institutions at the center of the financial crisis.
The paper said:
Deemed "too big to fail," these financial intermediaries lacked discipline and accountability leading up to the crisis and proved largely immune to the downside of their excessive risk taking. This special treatment violated a basic tenet of American capitalism: All people and institutions have the freedom to succeed and also to fail based on the merits of their actions. In a way, the 2008–09 bailouts exacted an unfair and nontransparent tax upon the American people.The Fed added:
Although unprecedented fiscal and monetary action in the throes of panic during 2008–09 may have prevented a full-blown depression, such intervention did not come without significant costs. Society must deal with the consequences of a swollen federal debt, an expanded Federal Reserve balance sheet and increased regulations and government intervention for years to come.The damage from the crisis remains hard to calculate, the paper said, given the possibility that the U.S. economy may never reach its old productivity level.
The paper concluded:
Given this range of estimates, the tepid economic recovery and the collateral damage sustained, it is crucial to implement effective policies that avoid future episodes whose magnitude could exceed even the staggering costs and consequences of the most recent financial crisis.(Read the full Dallas Fed report here.)
NSA
The Cowboy of the NSA Foreign Policy
James Clapper’s Financial War on the World Marcy Wheeler.
NSA Has Apparently Targeted SWIFT Network, Petrobras, and the French Diplomatic Network Kevin Drum
Helicopter circles US consulate in spy probe The Local
Johns Hopkins and the Case of the Missing NSA Blog Post ProPublica
Monday, September 9, 2013
Friday, September 6, 2013
NSA
US and UK spy agencies defeat privacy and security on the internet The Guardian.
How to remain secure against NSA surveillance Bruce Schneier
Garrett Brown Faces 105 Years in Jail Rolling Stone
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-05/bullrun-nsas-infatuation-back-door-penetration
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=224132
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
































